Making Property/Casualty Investments That Pay Off

Bookmark and Share

Automation of underwriting processes carries the promise of improved results, but can come at a significant cost. So where is the industry today, and when does it make sense to invest in automation?

Key research questions:

  • What are the different components of underwriting that can be automated?
  • Where are carriers utilizing automation in underwriting?
  • Are high levels of automation in underwriting correlated with improved metrics?

New York, NY (Apr. 4, 2016) – Underwriting is at the core of the insurance industry. The processes of selecting and pricing risk and the additional operational processes necessary to deliver a policy and provide ongoing services are essential to the profitability of a carrier. Over the last few years, carriers have been heavily engaged in replacing core policy administration systems and increasing the automation of their underwriting processes.

Automating processes can be expensive because of both the hard costs of purchasing technology, implementing technology, and changing processes and the soft costs. Change can be hard on both underwriting staff and on the agents who receive the output of the underwriting process.

So when does it make sense to invest in automation? Are there pieces of the underwriting process that, when automated, are more likely to improve results? Celent investigates these questions to provide guidance to carriers that are trying to prioritize their efforts.

“With this report, we wanted to understand the actual state of underwriting automation in the insurance industry,” says Karlyn Carnahan, a research director with Celent’s Insurance practice and author of the report. “Are carriers living up to the hype that implies that virtually every carrier out there has automated every step of the process? Or is the progress slower? Are carriers with older systems at a disadvantage? Do high levels of automation actually result in better financial results? The answers to these questions can help carriers plan where to invest their automation dollars.”

To understand what top carriers are doing in this area, Celent conducted a survey. The process of underwriting was broken into 26 logical components of work. For each component, three levels were defined, ranging from little to significant levels of automation. Carriers can use this report as a diagnostic tool by comparing their scores to the benchmarks.

Average levels of automation by LOB

Purchase the report from Celent.

About Celent

Celent is a research and advisory firm dedicated to helping financial institutions formulate comprehensive business and technology strategies. Celent publishes reports identifying trends and best practices in financial services technology and conducts consulting engagements for financial institutions looking to use technology to enhance existing business processes or launch new business strategies. With a team of internationally based analysts, Celent is uniquely positioned to offer strategic advice and market insights on a global basis. Celent is a member of the Oliver Wyman Group, which is part of Marsh & McLennan Companies (NYSE: MMC).

Source: Celent